Medi-Cal Factor Table
Black Infant Health Program
Effective fiscal year 2022-23
Updated February 2022
Alameda
|
116
|
41
|
157
|
73.9% |
| Contra Costa |
156
|
25
|
181 |
86.2% |
| Fresno |
203
|
30
|
233
|
87.1% |
| Kern |
53
|
3
|
56
|
94.6% |
| Long Beach |
60
|
30 |
90
|
66.7% |
| Los Angeles (3 agencies) |
260
|
70
|
330
|
78.8% |
| LA TCB |
113
|
19
|
132
|
85.6% |
| LA TCC |
127
|
45
|
172
|
73.8% |
| Pasadena |
20
|
6
|
26
|
76.9% |
| Riverside |
230
|
44
|
274
|
83.9% |
| Sacramento (3 agencies) |
153
| 45
|
198
|
77.3% |
| SAC CAPC |
48
|
23
|
71
|
67.6% |
| SAC MAN |
104
|
22
|
126
|
82.5% |
| Sacramento |
1
|
0
|
1
|
100.0% |
| San Bernardino |
159
|
27
|
186
|
85.5% |
| San Diego |
134
|
85
|
219
|
61.2% |
| San Francisco |
112
|
25
|
137
|
81.8% |
| San Joaquin |
86
|
14
|
100
|
86.0% |
| Santa Clara |
82
|
42
|
124
|
66.1% |
| Solano |
10
|
0 |
10
|
100.0% |
Notes
Women active in BIH between 7/01/2020-6/30/2021.
Uses the most recent insurance data available.
City of Pasadena is funded as a subcontractor of Los Angeles county.
Data Source
ETO Data System. Execution date: 1/15/2022
Prepared by
Program Evaluation and Data Systems Branch
Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division
Center for Family Health
California Department of Public Health