| | |
1.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Did the patient have a prodrome (fevers, chills, headache, lymphadenopathy, flu-like symptoms)? | Yes: recent cases have presented without an obvious prodrome. However, a patient with a strongāÆepidemiologic linkāÆPLUS prodromal symptoms might increase suspicion of mpox. Notably lymphadenopathy is a distinguishing feature of mpox. | No: recent cases have presented without an obvious prodrome. A patient with an epidemiologic link without prodromal symptoms might decrease suspicion of mpox ā close monitoring should occur for development of a rash or other symptoms. |
2.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Did the patient develop a rash? | Yes: all cases to date in California have developed a rash at some point in their course. | No:āÆsome cases have developed anorectal pain, tenesmus or bleeding, but these were from non-visible perianal lesions. |
3.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Where is the rash? | Uncertain: Classically, mpox rashes have started in the face and extremities then spread to rest of body. In recent cases, rash has often begun in mucosal areas (e.g., genital, perianal, oral mucosa) and in some patients, the lesions have been scattered or localized to a specific body site rather than diffuse and have not involved the face or extremities. | Uncertain: Classically, mpox rashes have started in the face and extremities then spread to rest of body. In recent cases, rash has often begun in mucosal areas (e.g., genital, perianal, oral mucosa) and in some patients, the lesions have been scattered or localized to a specific body site rather than diffuse and have not involved the face or extremities. |
4.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ What is the rash appearance? | Deep-seated and well-circumscribed lesions, often with central umbilication. Lesions progress through specific sequential stages, sometimes rapidlyāmacules, papules, vesicles, pustules, and scabs. | Other presentations of rashes and rashes that do not progress. Remember, rashes in certain stages can be mistaken for other common rash etiologies, including sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) such as syphilis, herpes, etc. |
5.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Is the stage of rash consistent within each body part? | Uncertain: Although lesions on each part of body classically are at the same stage, recent cases have had rashes at different stages of progression in the same part of the body. | Uncertain: Although lesions on each part of body classically are at the same stage, recent cases have had rashes at different stages of progression in the same part of the body. |
6.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Is the rash painful? | Yes:āÆ mpox rash is sometimes very painful and is often a reason people seek treatment. | No:āÆRashes such as those associated with HSV can be painful however other STDs such as syphilis are not typically painful. |
7.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Did the patient test positive for other rash etiology? | No:āÆnegativeāÆtest for other etiologies that cause rashes that appear similar to mpox (e.g., VZV, HSV, syphilis). Coinfections have been seen with STDs, particularly syphilis, so positive test for an STIāÆmay not completely rule out mpox. | Yes:āÆpositive test for other rash etiology, especially one thatāÆcause rashes that appear similar to mpox. Coinfections with STDs, particularly syphilis, have occurred in recent cases, so a positive test does not rule out mpox. |
8.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Was there contact with a known or suspect mpox case? | Contact with lesions or bodily fluids Sexual Contacts Household Contacts Prolonged (3 hours+) unmasked contact within six feet | Masked contact within 6 feet Contact with lesions/bodily fluids while wearing PPE. Shared airspace contactāÆ>6 feet |
9.āÆāÆāÆāÆāÆāÆ Did the patient recently participate in parties or gatherings involving sex, especially with multiple sex partners? Or did the patient participate in intimate contact at venues where there is sex on premises such as bathhouses or saunas? | Yes:āÆthere have been a number of cases and contacts associated with sex or extended physical contact in sex related events, or bathhouses/saunas, with multiple sex partners. | No:āÆno participation or contact with someone who has participated in these activities or attended these venues/events is less suggestive of mpox. |
10.āÆāÆāÆ Is the patient part of a social group known to have high mpox incidence or risk? | Yes:āÆthe majority of cases seen so far in non-endemic countries have been in men or transgender persons who have sex with men. | No:āÆno known linkage to a high-risk group or reported high-risk social or sexual behaviors would be less suggestive of mpox. |