Emerging Technologies
āWhat are the benefits of new whole-room disinfection technologies?- The adequacy of manual cleaning and disinfection is often suboptimal; e.g., wet contact time is not always achieved
- "Touchless" or non-manual techniques can provide a higher level of disinfection
- These technologies have been shown to be clinically effective in stopping outbreaks
http://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/htis/nov-2014/RC0545%20Room%20Disinfection%20Final.pdf (read report via Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health) |
āWhat is environmental fogging?Hydrogen peroxide in either a dry mist or vapor form. - Pros
- Reliable microbiology activity against many pathogens
- Mist or vapor is uniformly distributed; no furniture needs to be moved
- No toxic residues
- Evidence is still being gathered; CDC has no recommendations for use
- Cons
- Patients and staff must leave room because the vapor can cause airway or mucous membrane irritation
- Room must be sealed and monitored for leaks
- Rooms cannot be rapidly turned over
- High-level training required
- Cost is substantial
AHRQ Technical Brief #22, Environmental Cleaning for the Prevention of HealthcareAssociated Infections, 2015 (read the Technical Brief via Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) |
āWhat is the efficacy of vapor or mist-based fogging technologies?- In direct comparison between hydrogen peroxide dry-mist versus bleach solution in rooms that had previously housed patients with CDI:
- Manual cleaning with bleach reduced C. difficile spores 50%
- The addition of hydrogen peroxide vapor after manual cleaning reduced spores by91% (p<.005).
Barbut et al. ICHE. 2009 (read article via PubMed) |
āWhat are some caveats to use of whole-room disinfection technologies?Whole room disinfection cannot substitute for good physical cleaning practices, including compliance with hand hygiene and avoiding cross-contamination Infection preventionists, industrial hygienists, and environmental services supervisors should assess the cleaning procedures, chemicals used, and the safety issues to determine if nearby patients need to be temporarily relocated when disinfecting a room
|
āWhat is ultraviolet (UV) disinfection?Anderson et al. Infection Control. 2006 (read article via PubMed) http://www.xenex.com/how-uv-disinfection-works (read about UV cleaning device at Xenex.com) Anderson et al. Infection Control. 2006 (read article via PubMed) Miller et al. AJIC. 2015; Nagaraja et al. AJIC. 2015; Nerandzic et al. BMC Infections Diseases. 2010 (read article via PubMed) HICPAC 2008 (read Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization via CDC) http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/592/2103/healthcare-infections-report-150810.pdf (read the Technical Brief via Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) |
āSummary of Key PointsA properly cleaned care environment is essential to prevent or contain HAIs A surface must be physically cleaned before it can be disinfected Consistent use of best practices and clarity of roles should be emphasized Use of technologies such as microfiber, monitoring systems, and whole-room disinfection after cleaning are increasingly becoming the community standard of care EVS staff should be valued and supported so they can maximize their unique contributions to preventing HAI
|
āEnvironmental Cleaning Resources
CDC/HICPAC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, 2003
CDC/HICPAC Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008
CDC Options for Evaluating Environmental Cleaning Toolkit
CDC Environmental Checklist for Monitoring Terminal Cleaning
CDC Environmental Checklist (scroll to bottom of page and download word doc)
CDC Environmental Cleaning Eval Worksheet (scroll to bottom of page and download excel doc)
CDC/HICPAC Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings Published 2002
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare (2009)